Archive for Darwinism

Stuff Going On — 06/01/2017

Posted in For Free Trade, For God with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 1, 2017 by cavalier973

Will he, or won’t he? President Trump made a campaign promise to abandon the Paris Accords/Treaty/Agreement. Something I did not know is that this “treaty” was signed just a few days before Trump was elected! Anyway, destroying national economies as a sin offering to Gaia is not environmentalism, and that’s all these accords will do. Climate “science” is actually pseudoscientific flapdoodle–the same as Darwinism and Transgenderism–covered with a veneer of respectability provided by government endorsement.

CNN has a story about how Pres. Trump is making some sort of concessions when he abandons the deal, for his daughter’s conscience’s sake. This story is relayed in a video, which I did not watch, and so will not link.

Here is Jeffrey Tucker on the “Incredible Arrogance of the Paris Agreement/Accords/”Treaty”.

The real crime in the whole “Trump colluding with Russia” investigation may be that President Obama’s officials illegally unmasked Michael Flynn. An interesting detail revealed by “sources” in the Wall Street Journal (I think I have made my position clear concerning the reliability of unnamed sources) is that Samantha Power, President Obama’s ambassador to the U.N., got her own subpoena. It would be hilarious if, after Democrats and leftist-progressives pushed so hard for investigating Trump’s ties to Russia, the result is that President Obama and his lackeys are sent to prison.

Theoretical physicists make the claim that cosmic inflation can never be falsified, so the “Big Bang Theory” is pseudoscience. Well, I’m overstating a bit, I suppose…

An excerpt:

“Inflation theory was proposed by physicist Alan Guth to solve a number of serious problems in early versions of the Big Bang model. Supposedly, the universe underwent an extremely short period of accelerated expansion right after the Big Bang.

However, physicists later realized this version of inflation theory was too simplistic. Newer versions of inflationary models have inflation stopping at different times in different places, leading to the idea of a multiverse consisting of infinitely many ‘pocket’ universes.2″

As with all things proposed by the MatNats and the Darwinoids, no amount of actual science can falsify the Narrative of a Godless, self-creating universe in which information can arise spontaneously without an Intelligent Source.

 

Employers added 253,000 people to their payrolls in the Month of May, which beat estimates of 170,000 newly employed persons.

I blame Trump.

The Most Oft-repeated Statement in Hell

Posted in For God, Uncategorized with tags , , , , on February 12, 2016 by cavalier973

The most oft-repeated statement in Hell is, I suspect: “How could I have been so stupid?”

Today the Darwinoids celebrate the birth of the silly man who adopted silly ideas and put them out as “science”.

 

Darwinoid Forum Debate Tactics

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , on March 2, 2015 by cavalier973

The article is here on creationwiki.

Dino DNA

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , on December 24, 2014 by cavalier973

‘Bio-film! It’s bio-film!’ Desperate for an answer to this damning evidence some evolutionists claimed that the blood vessels that Dr Schweitzer had found were simply bio-film (a product of more recent bacterial action).12 This was sometimes shouted out during CMI presentations by skeptics, and anticreationist blog sites and chat rooms would give this as the ‘go-to’ answer when creationists raised the topic.

But, even if the blood vessels had been bio-film, this could hardly have explained the presence of proteins and DNA.13 In any case, though, ‘bio-film’ only rarely gets trotted out in more recent years, as Schweitzer herself has been able to present a powerful case for the blood vessels not being bio-films.14

Darwinoids and CSI

Posted in For God with tags , , , , on November 24, 2014 by cavalier973

We often distinguish between the science of present processes and the science of figuring out what happened in the past (see ‘It’s not science and Argument: Creationism is religion, not science). It’s a helpful distinction to make because it shows that we need to test evolution and millions of years differently than we would test, say, gravity or the speed of light. It also shows how there is generally a greater potential for uncertainty in the science of past events than there is in the science of present processes.

But many critics of biblical creation have found what they think is a good counter to this distinction. They claim that the science used to show that evolution is fact “works just like CSI” (Crime Scene Investigation).2 This argument seems stronger than the simplistic ‘religion vs science’ idea. The scientific approach used by evolutionists to try to reconstruct the past does have a lot in common with CSI—they are both examples of what could be called ‘forensic’ or ‘historical’ science (see CSI … and CMI). In each case, there is an attempt to use good science to reconstruct the past.

DNA and Darwinoid Prediction Failure

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , , , , on October 27, 2014 by cavalier973

Discoveries of DNA sequence that contain different languages, each one with multiple purposes, are utterly defying evolutionary predictions. What was once hailed as redundant code is proving to be key in protein production.1

Anyone who wants to know the latest scientific discoveries would do well to monitor the Creationist websites. Even if one doesn’t believe in the truth of Creationism, one gets a good overview of what’s happening in the World of Science. Many arguments I’ve seen made by Darwinoids rely on information that is years or decades old. Of course, most “arguments” by Darwinoids are simply bald assertion sans facts.

101 Facts and Foreknowledge

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , on May 26, 2014 by cavalier973

The list is here.