Archive for Creationism

Jay Seegert on the Ham-Nye Debate

Posted in For God with tags , , , , on December 30, 2014 by cavalier973

http://www.cecwisc.org/InTheNews/bill-nye-ken-ham-debate

Dino DNA

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , on December 24, 2014 by cavalier973

‘Bio-film! It’s bio-film!’ Desperate for an answer to this damning evidence some evolutionists claimed that the blood vessels that Dr Schweitzer had found were simply bio-film (a product of more recent bacterial action).12 This was sometimes shouted out during CMI presentations by skeptics, and anticreationist blog sites and chat rooms would give this as the ‘go-to’ answer when creationists raised the topic.

But, even if the blood vessels had been bio-film, this could hardly have explained the presence of proteins and DNA.13 In any case, though, ‘bio-film’ only rarely gets trotted out in more recent years, as Schweitzer herself has been able to present a powerful case for the blood vessels not being bio-films.14

Darwinoids and CSI

Posted in For God with tags , , , , on November 24, 2014 by cavalier973

We often distinguish between the science of present processes and the science of figuring out what happened in the past (see ‘It’s not science and Argument: Creationism is religion, not science). It’s a helpful distinction to make because it shows that we need to test evolution and millions of years differently than we would test, say, gravity or the speed of light. It also shows how there is generally a greater potential for uncertainty in the science of past events than there is in the science of present processes.

But many critics of biblical creation have found what they think is a good counter to this distinction. They claim that the science used to show that evolution is fact “works just like CSI” (Crime Scene Investigation).2 This argument seems stronger than the simplistic ‘religion vs science’ idea. The scientific approach used by evolutionists to try to reconstruct the past does have a lot in common with CSI—they are both examples of what could be called ‘forensic’ or ‘historical’ science (see CSI … and CMI). In each case, there is an attempt to use good science to reconstruct the past.

DNA and Darwinoid Prediction Failure

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , , , , on October 27, 2014 by cavalier973

Discoveries of DNA sequence that contain different languages, each one with multiple purposes, are utterly defying evolutionary predictions. What was once hailed as redundant code is proving to be key in protein production.1

Anyone who wants to know the latest scientific discoveries would do well to monitor the Creationist websites. Even if one doesn’t believe in the truth of Creationism, one gets a good overview of what’s happening in the World of Science. Many arguments I’ve seen made by Darwinoids rely on information that is years or decades old. Of course, most “arguments” by Darwinoids are simply bald assertion sans facts.

101 Facts and Foreknowledge

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , on May 26, 2014 by cavalier973

The list is here.

The Nature of Science

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , on May 26, 2014 by cavalier973

Dr. Purdom reviews “The Unbelievers”

Posted in For God with tags , , , , , , , on April 11, 2014 by cavalier973

Her article is here.

 

“What discoveries are not being made in our modern world because so many scientists have decided that the universe and every living thing is just the result of random chance (e.g., consider the case of “junk” DNA“)?” ~Dr. Purdom

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 94 other followers