Archive for the Uncategorized Category

Another Hot Sauce Recipe

Posted in Uncategorized on April 12, 2015 by cavalier973

This is also from a Reason.com Hit & Run commenter, a fellow who uses the handle “sarcasmic”.

Apparently, one takes a mess of dried Thai chili peppers and grinds them, seeds and all, with a mortar and pestle. Add salt, garlic, honey, and a splash of vinegar, to taste.

It reportedly is good on fish.

Eduardo Antonello

Posted in Uncategorized on September 7, 2014 by cavalier973

I’m quickly becoming a fanboy:

 

This is a tune he composed himself, but he does a lot of Renaissance/Baroque music on his channel “Early Music in a different way”.

History Revisionism

Posted in Uncategorized on August 31, 2014 by cavalier973

Over at LewRockwell.com.

An article on same-sex couples

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on May 23, 2014 by cavalier973

Interesting stuff.

The question as posed: “Are same-sex couples just like you?” (“You” meaning heterosexual couples).

My answer: “Only if they can have children through sexual intercourse.  Oh, wait; they can’t even have sexual intercourse (whether it’s a male or a female couple being considered).  The best they can manage is mutual masturbation sessions.”

Shaxper != Shakespeare

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , on April 6, 2014 by cavalier973

10 Reasons

On Ayn Rand

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on November 16, 2013 by cavalier973

Ultimately, Rand’s egoism is irreconcilable with both Christianity and capitalism. In fact, since the system fails to have any true explanatory value, it’s difficult to find any reason to adopt Objectivism at all. Fortunately, we don’t have to buy into Rand’s philosophical errors in order to appreciate her fiction. We just have to keep in mind that instead of reading a “novel of ideas”, we are reading a work of fantasy.

Nye & Miller vs. McElroy & Purdom…on Al Jazeera!

Posted in Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on September 13, 2013 by cavalier973

Nye also responded to me trying to discredit the definition of historical science by saying that he believed in the Civil War, Newton, and Galileo even though he wasn’t there to observe them. I didn’t get to respond because we were out of time. Here’s what I would have said: “How do you know about the Civil War, Newton, and Galileo? You depend on eyewitness accounts of the people themselves or people who witnessed the events to help you know the truth about the past. So why not do the same when it comes to earth’s history and believe in the eyewitness account of the Creator God written for us in Scripture? In the scheme of billions of years of the earth’s and universe’s history, there were no modern humans on the scene until a couple hundred thousand years ago. You need to realize that everything you think about most of this history is based on nothing more than unverifiable assumptions and imagination and not eyewitness accounts.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 95 other followers